Is it necessary to assess children? Is it necessary to assess
their learning?
I believe
that the assessment of children is
necessary. Assessment of children provides information as to a child’s
strengths and weaknesses. These assessments indicate whether or not there are
medical issues that need to be addressed, such as hearing loss. They can also
indicate problems with cognitive or social domains. Once that information has
been gathered, it can be used to guide teachers and healthcare providers to
insure that the child receives the proper care and education.
Because
these assessments involve the whole child, they require the participation of
several different professionals. Medical professionals are needed to determine
if a child’s physical development is on track; while educators determine if a child’s
cognitive and social skills are on a par with his peers. If a child is
determined to have delays in either of these areas, it may be necessary to
involve other specialists.
Whether or
not it Is necessary to assess a child’s learning is a hotly debated issue. The
problem that I see with standardized testing is that it is used to determine the
success of the school system; this reduces the student to the status of a
product. Since we are talking about individuals, this is a distasteful
situation. While I understand that people are looking for a way to hold their
schools accountable, I’m not convinced that standardized testing is the
appropriate avenue.
While I was
researching what other countries do when it comes to assessing their students,
I found it interesting that many of the arguments raised in Germany sounded
like those that have been voiced here. Germany is relatively new to
standardized testing. They didn’t begin using them until around 2004 and they
did so in response to poor showings on an international standardized test. From
the beginning, concerns were raised about teachers potentially “teaching to the
test” and ignoring instruction in subjects that were not included in these
tests. There were also concerns that the tests had a narrow focus on cognitive
objectives without any consideration of factors that affect a child’s learning.
On a
positive note, it seems that some countries are realizing that there are other
aspects of a student that should be looked at beyond their cognitive
achievements. Several countries, including Germany, have begun testing a child’s
creative ability. I think that this is a good thing because things change so
quickly in the world now, being a creative problem-solver is an important
skill.
Waddington, D. J., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (n.d.). Making
it Comparable. New York, NY: Waxmann. Retrieved October 11, 2014
Hi Anita,
ReplyDeleteyou said it correctly that standardize testings are used to determine school's performance and not the children. Teachers and students are evaluated based on their assessment; therefore they teach and do what is necessary to past the assessment. For instance, take the teaching scandal in GA. the focus was not to enhance children's talents, skills or intelligence; instead the focus was to demonstrate a great school system based on performance.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Anita,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your point of view that assessing children is important. It is not only benefit for teachers to know a child better but also help to explore a child's talent and/or abilities. It is also true that some schools rely on the results of assessments. For instance, some of my local schools keep their reputation by pushing their students getting a good scores through various of assessments. This is not a healthy way of educational evaluate system, in my opinion. However, considering the 'equal' chance of getting formal education, it seems this type of assessing system is keeping on going for a long while anyway.
Hi Anita,
ReplyDeleteI enjoy reading how you distinguish assessment of children's learning from assessment of children. It give me a clear view on the purpose of assessment. I agree with you. A student does not get a high score in the text it does not mean that he or she weak on it. It might be the way he/she learning style is different from the teaching style. Change the teaching style the student may learn better.
Anita,
ReplyDeleteGermany really surprised me! I never knew that they were against standardized testing for so long. I agree that teaching to the test limits other areas of learning and limits creativity. However I learned from your post that Germany is able to test a child's creativity which I believe is fantastic. Not sure if how you would actually go about doing that but that is definitely something to research to see if we have in the U.S.
I am so glad to here that there are other countries out there that are having some of the same issues that America is having on the issue of testing. I think it is difficult to not teach to the test at times. Even if you are teaching your normal lesson there tends to be something in the back of your head that says, "I think I remember seeing this before", even of you do not remember where you saw it or on which test. There are so many. I think it is important to teach children to the best of our abilities and try to make it fun and interesting so that they retain the information. Even then we are not assured that they will be able to get it down correctly on paper for a test.
ReplyDeleteI was also surprised to learn that Germany just recently started giving standardized tests. I think it exciting that Germany has found a way to test the creativity of children. Maybe we could get them to share their knowledge.
Anita,
ReplyDeleteGreat blog post. I do agree with your statement that standardized tests are to measure how well the teachers are teaching and the school's performance rather than what that child has learned since the beginning of the year. When I was in school we had to take a test called the TAKS test and I could not stand it - the only reason I couldn't stand it was because the teachers only taught what would be on the test and that's it - nothing more, nothing less. I think when teachers teach what's only a test is a disadvantage to the students as a whole because think when we go to the next level (grade) and the teacher gives us a test to see what we learned from the previous grade and we all fail because we didn't learn the required information because the teacher was too busy teaching us the material for the standardized test.